Organizer: John Cairns
Advisors: Raymond Gesteland, Peter Lengyel, Fritz Lipmann, Robert Thach and James Watson
The first Cold Spring Harbor Symposium dealing proteins had been
held in 1949. Then, Paul Zamecnik noted in his opening remarks for
the 1969 Symposium, it was not yet certain that amino acids became
incorporated into proteins by peptide bond formation, and that reversal
of proteolysis was still considered a possible mechanism. At the
1963 Symposium on Synthesis and Structure of Macromolecules, reports
and discussions of protein synthesis occupied only 112 pages but
now, in a “...spectacular display of progress...”, a
whole Symposium was devoted to the topic. Zamecnik with his colleagues,
in particular Mahlon Hoagland, had developed an in vitro system
for studying protein synthesis, and with this they had discovered
transfer RNAs and shown how these carried amino acids for protein
synthesis. By 1961, messenger RNA had been detected, and in the
1960s, the ribosome, the site of protein synthesis, became the object
of intense research.
This Symposium, then, reported a vast quantity of data. No fewer
than 20 papers dealt with ribosome structure and the formidable
complexity of the complex was apparent. Alfred Tissiérres,
for example, listed 34 proteins from the E. coli 50S subunit and
20 from the 30S subunit. Given the complexity of the ribosome,
there was much interest in how it was assembled and Nomura described
the reconstitution of the 30S subunit. Attempts to localize the
enzymatic activity responsible for formation of the peptide bond
went hand-in-hand with the structural studies, and there were
sessions covering the molecular details of initiation, translocation
and elongation, and termination.
Indeed, the Symposium seems to be overwhelmed with molecular
details, as was the summary given by Peter Lengyel. John Cairns
commented in his foreword, “A science comes of age when
the principles on which it was founded have been vindicated and
are replaced, as an occupation, by the accumulation of detail...”
He argued that this was a good thing –“...detail from
which, of course, further principles will eventually arise”–
but the published volume gives a sense of too much detail and
too few principles. That Cairns was correct became clear 32 years
later in a spectacular Symposium devoted to The Ribosome (2001).
This was John Cairns’ last Symposium as director of Cold
Spring Harbor. In 1968, he resigned from the post although he
continued to do research at the Laboratory until 1972. The directorship
was assumed by Jim Watson who divided his time between Harvard
and Cold Spring Harbor until he came to live at the Laboratory
in 1972.